Skip to main content

Full text of "A measuring rod to test text books, and reference books in schools, colleges and libraries"

See other formats


A  MEASURING  ROD 

To 
TEST  TEXT  BOOKS,  AND  REFERENCE  BOOKS 

In 

Schools,  Colleges  and  Libraries 


Prepared  By 

MILDRED  LEWIS  RUTHERFORD 

ATHENS,  GA. 


At  the  Request  of  the 
UNITED  CONFEDERATE  VETERANS 


RESOLUTIONS  BY  UNITED  CONFEDERATE  VETERANS 


The  following  Resolutions  were  offered  by  General  C.  Irvine 
Walker  of  Charleston,  S.  C,  at  the  Reunion  in  Atlanta,  Octo- 
ber 8th,  after  Miss  Rutherford's  address  on  the  importance 
of  having  the  South 's  history  correctly  taught  in  our  schools: 

"Whereas,  we  have  heard  with  the  deepest  interest  the  pa- 
triotic, historic,  instructive  and  suggestive  address  of  the  illus- 
trious Southern  Historian,  Miss  Mildred  Rutherford,  Therefore 
Be  it  Resolved: 

"1st.  That  our  thanks  are  due  and  are  hereby  tendered  to 
Miss  Rutherford  for  her  eloquent  and  truthful  presentation  of 
the  facts  of  Confederate  history. 

"2nd.  That  we  accept  her  suggestion  as  to  having  such  facts 
imparted  to  the  young  of  our  country,  so  that  they  may  learn 
correctly  the  rights  and  the  history  of  that  great  struggle  for 
which  we  offered  our  lives  and  gave  everything  save  our  sacred 
honor. 

"3rd.  That  to  make  an  organized  effort  to  accomplish  what 
she  suggests,  a  committee  of  five  be  appointed,  and  if  by  it 
deemed  practicable,  to  carry  out  the  same,  under  the  authority 
of  this  federation. 

"4th.  That  the  cooperation  of  the  Sons  of  Confederate  Vet- 
erans and  United  Daughters  of  the  Confederacy  be  invited  and 
each  asked  to  appoint  five  members  to  form  a  part  of  our  Com- 
mittee. " 

COMMITTEE  APPOINTED 

At  the  Reunion  held  in  Atlanta,  October  7-11,  1919,  the  United 
Confederate  Veterans  resolved  to  inaugurate  a  movement  to 
disseminate  the  truths  of  Confederate  history. 

To  carry  out  the  same,  the  following  Committee  was  ap- 
pointed : 

GEN.  C.  IRVINE  WALKER,  Honorary  Comdr.-in-Chief,  TL  C. 
V.,  Chairman,  Charleston,  S.  C. 

GEN.  JULIAN  S.  CARR,  Comdr.  Army  No.  Va.,  U.  C.  V.,  Dur- 
ham, N.  C. 

GEN.   CALVIN  B.  VANCE,   Comdr.  Army  Tenn.,  U.   C.  V., 
Batesville,  Miss. 

GEN.  VIRGIL  Y.  COOK,  Comdr.  Trans.  Miss.,  U.  C.  V,  Bates- 
ville, Ark. 

GEN.   A.   J.   TWIGGS,   Comdr.   East  Ga.  Brigade,  U.    C.   V., 
Augusta,  Ga. 

2 


The  Sons  of   Confederate  Veterans  have  appointed  the  fol- 
lowing Committee  to  cooperate  with  the  Veterans: 
REV.  J.  CLEVELAND  HALL,  Chairman,  Danville,  Va. 
DR.  JNO.  W.  HOOPER,  Roanoke,  Ala. 
W.  C.  CHANDLER,  Memphis,  Tenn. 
W.  S.  LEMLEY,  Temple,  Texas. 
J.  J.  SLAUGHTER,  Muskogee,  Okla. 

A  MEASURING  ROD  FOR  TEXT-BOOKS 

"  'A  Measuring  Rod  For  Text-Books,'  prepared  by  Miss  Mil- 
dred L.  Rutherford,  by  which  every  text-book  on  history  and 
literature  in  Southern  schools  should  be  tested  by  those  desiring 
the  truth,  was  submitted  to  the  Committee.  This  outline  was 
read  and  carefully  considered. 

"The  Committee  charged,  as  it  is,  with  the  dissemination  of 
the  truths  of  Confederate  history,  earnestly  and  fully  and 
officially,  approve  all  that  is  herein  so  truthfully  written  as  to 
that  eventful  period. 

"The  Committee  respectfully  urges  all  authorities  charged 
with  the  selection  of  text-books  for  colleges,  schools  and  all 
scholastic  institutions  to  measure  all  books  offered  for  adoption 
by  this  "Measuring  Bod"  and  adopt  none  which  do  not  accord 
full  justice  to  the  South.  And  all  library  authorities  in  the 
Southern  States  are  requested  to  mark  all  books  in  their  collec- 
tions which  do  not  come  up  to  the  same  measure,  on  the  title 
page  thereof,  "Unjust  to  the  South." 

"This  Committee  further  asks  all  scholastic  and  library  au- 
thorities, in  all  parts  of  the  country,  in  justice  and  fairness  to 
their  fellow  citizens  of  the  South,  to  yield  to  the  above  request. 
"C.  IRVINE  WALKER,  Chairman." 


INDEX*  Page 

I.  The  Constitution  of  the  United  States,   1787,  Was  a 
Compact    between    Sovereign    States    and    Was    not 

Perpetual  nor  National 6 

II.  Secession  Was  not  Rebellion 7 

III.  The  North  Was  Responsible  for  the  War  between  the 

States  8 

IV.  The  War  between  the  States  Was  not  Fought  to  Hold 

the  Slaves 9 

V.  The  Slaves  Were  Not  Ill-Treated  in  the  South  and  the 
North    Was    largely    Responsible    for    their    Presence 

in  the  South 10 

VI.  Coercion  Was  not  Constitutional 11 

VII.  The    Federal    Government    Was    Responsible    for    the 

Andersonville  Horrors 12 

VIII.  The  Republican  Party  that  Elected  Abraham  Lincoln 

Was  not  Friendly  to  the  South 13 

IX.  The   South  Desired  Peace  and  Made   every   Effort  to 

Obtain  it 14,  15,  16 

X.  The   Policy   of  the   Northern  Army   Was  to   Destroy 

Property — the  Southern  Army  to  Protect  it 18-21 

XL  The  South  Has  never  Had  its  Rightful  Place  in  Liter- 
ature   22-23 

*  See   "Truths   of  History,"   by   Mildred   Lewis   Rutherford,   Athens,    Ga.,   for 
additional  testimony. 

A  FOREWORD  FROM  MISS  RUTHERFORD 
Realizing  that  the  text-books  in  history  and  literature  which 
the  children  of  the  South  are  now  studying,  and  even  the  ones 
from  which  many  of  their  parents  studied  before  them,  are  in 
many  respects  unjust  to  the  South  and  her  institutions,  and 
that  a  far  greater  injustice  and  danger  is  threatening  the  South 
today  from  the  late  histories  which  are  being  published,  guilty 
not  only  of  misrepresentations  but  of  gross  omissions,  refusing 
to  give  the  South  credit  for  what  she  has  accomplished,  as  His- 
torian of  the  U.  D.  C,  and  one  vitally  interested  in  all  that  per- 
tains to  the  South,  I  have  prepared,  as  it  were,  a  testing  or 
measuring  rod.  Committees  appointed  by  Boards  of  Education 
or  heads  of  private  institutions  and  their  teachers  can  apply  this 
test  when  books  are  presented  for  adoption,  so  that  none  ivho 
really  desire  the  truth  need  be  hampered  in  their  recommenda- 
tion for  acceptance  or  rejection  of  such  books. 

Absolute  fairness  to  the  North  and  South  is  stressed  as  only 
Truth  is  History. 

MILDRED  LEWIS  RUTHERFORD, 

Athens,  Georgia. 
4 


WARNING*  f 

Do  not  reject  a  text-book  because  it  does  not  contain  all  that 
the  South  claims — a  text-book  cannot  be  a  complete  encyclopedia. 

Do  not  reject  a  text  book  because  it  omits  to  mention  your 
father,  your  grandfather,  your  personal  friend,  socially  or  polit- 
ically— it  would  take  volumes  to  contain  all  of  the  South 's 
great  men  and  their  deeds. 

Do  not  reject  a  text-book  because  it  may  disagree  with  your 
estimate  of  the  South 's  great  men,  and  the  leaders  of  the  South 's 
Army  and  Navy — the  world  can  never  agree  with  any  one  per- 
son's estimate  in  all  things. 

But — reject  a  book  that  speaks  of  the  Constitution  other  than 
a  Compact  between  Sovereign  States. 

Reject  a  text-book  that  does  not  give  the  principles  for  which 
the  South  fought  in  1861,  and  does  not  clearly  outline  the  in- 
terferences with  the  rights  guaranteed  to  the  South  by  the 
Constitution,  and  which  caused  secession. 

Reject  a  book  that  calls  the  Confederate  soldier  a  traitor  or 
rebel,  and  the  war  a  rebellion. 

Reject  a  book  that  says  the  South  fought  to  hold  her  slaves. 

Reject  a  book  that  speaks  of  the  slaveholder  of  the  South  as 
cruel  and  unjust  to  his  slaves. 

Reject  a  text-book  that  glorifies  Abraham  Lincoln  and  villifies 
Jefferson  Davis,  unless  a  truthful  cause  can  be  found  for  such 
glorification  and  villification  before  1865. 

Reject  a  text-book  that  omits  to  tell  of  the  South 's  heroes 
and  their  deeds  when  the  North's  heroes  and  their  deeds  are 
made  prominent. 

Refuse  to  adopt  any  text-book,  or  endorse  any  set  of  books, 
upon  the  promise  of  changes  being  made  to  omit  the  objection- 
able features.* 

A  list  of  books,  condemned  or  commended  by  the  Veterans, 
Sons  of  Veterans,  and  U.  D.  C,  is  being  prepared  by  Miss  Ruth- 
erford as  a  guide  for  Text-Book  Committees  and  Librarians. 

This  list  of  course  contains  only  the  names  of  those  books 
which  have  been  submitted  for  examination.  Others  will  be 
added  and  published  monthly  in  "The  Confederate  Veteran/' 
Nashville,  Tennessee. 


*  The  endorsement  of  a  series  of  Historical  Novels.  "The  Real  Romance  of 
History,"  was  once  given  by  the  Historian-General,  U.  D.  C,  upon  the  prom- 
ise to  change  the  objectionable  statements  regarding  the  War  between  the 
States.  The  endorsement  was  used  but  the  promise  was  not  kept — her  endorse- 
ment sold  many  books  containing  the  falsehoods. 

t  There  was  not  time  to  submit  this  "Warning"  to  the  Veterans  or  Sons  of 
Veterans,  but  Miss  Rutherford  thinks  it  will  meet  with  their  approval. 


A  Measuring  Rod  for  Text  Books 

(See    " Truths    of   History,"    by    Mildred    Lewis    Rutherford, 
Athens,  Ga.,  for  additional  testimony). 


THE  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE  UNITED  STATES 
1787,  WAS  A  COMPACT  BETWEEN  SOVEREIGN 
STATES,  AND  WAS  NOT  PERPETUAL  NOR 
NATIONAL. 

AUTHORITY: 

Elliott 's  Debates,  Vol.  V.,  p.  214: 

"When  the  Constitution  was  outlined  and  read,  the 
words  Perpetual  Union  which  had  been  in  the  Articles  of 
Confederation  were  omitted.  Alexander  Hamilton  and 
others  noticing  it,  and  desiring  a  Union,  opposed  the  adop- 
tion of  the  Constitution.  Some  one  moved  to  have  it  made 
a  National  Government,  but  this  motion  was  unanimously 
defeated.  Senator  Ellsworth  of  Connecticut  and  Senator 
Gorham  of  Massachusetts  have  testified  to  this." 
Daniel  Webster,  "The  Federalist,"  p.  908: 

"If  the  states  were  not  left  to  leave  the  Union  when  their 
rights  were   interfered   with,   the   government   would   have 
been  National,  but  the  Convention  refused  to  baptize  it  by 
that  name." 
Daniel  Webster,  Capon  Springs  Speech,  in  1851 : 

"The  Union  is  a  Union  of  States  founded  upon  Compact. 
How  is  it  to  be  supposed  that  when  different  parties  enter 
into  a  compact  for  certain  purposes  either  can  disregard 
one  provision  of  it  and  expect  others  to  observe  the  rest? 

"If  the  Northern  States  wilfully  and  deliberately  refuse 
to  carry  out  their  part  of  the  Constitution,  the  South  would 
be  no  longer  bound  to  keep  the  compact. 

"A  bargain  broken  on  one  side  is  broken  on  all  sides." 
Daniel  Webster  in  1833  said : 

"If  a  contract,  it  rests  on  plighted  faith,  and  the  mode 
of  redress  would  be  to  declare  the  whole  void.     States  may 
secede  if  a  League  or  Compact." 
Henry  Cabot  Lodge  says : 

"The  weak  place  in  Webster's  armour  in  the  Hayne- 
Webster  Debate  was  historical — the  facts  were  against  him. 
And  Chief  Justice  Story  in  that  controversy  never  once 
mentioned  secession,  he  was  only  stressing  nullification." 


II. 

Secession  Was  Not  Rebellion 

AUTHORITY: 

Dr.  Henry  Wade  Rogers,  Dean  of  the  Law  Department  of  Yale : 

"When  peace  came  it  was  found  that  the  Articles  of 
Confederation  were  weak,  in  that  the  Central  government 
could  not  legally  assume  sovereign  power — that  power  re- 
sided in  those  free,  sovereign  and  independent  States,  and 
there  was  no  delegation  of  any  rights  to  a  central  head. 

"It  became  necessary,  therefore,  to  change  the  Articles 
of  Confederation  so  that  the  States  should  be  brought  to 
cooperate,  by  realizing  that  the  government  should  not  be 
a  perpetual  Union,  but  an  agreement  by  which  certain 
rights  were  reserved  for  the  Federal  government,  and  cer- 
tain rights  were  reserved  for  the  State." 

Rawle 's  "View  of  the  Constitution"  was  a  text-book  used  at 
West  Point.     Rawle  said: 

"It  will  depend  upon  the  State  itself  whether  it  will 
continue  a  member  of  the  Union." 

"If  the  States  are  interfered  with  they  may  wholly  with- 
draw from  the  Union."     (pp.  289,  290). 

"General  Lee  told  Bishop  Wilmer,  of  Louisiana,  that  if 
it  had  not  been  for  the  instruction  received  from  Rawle 's 
text-book  at  West  Point  he  would  not  have  left  the  United 
States  Army  and  joined  the  Confederate  Army  at  the 
breaking  out  of  the  War  between  the  States." 

Benjamin  T.  Wade,  Senator  from  Ohio,  1858 : 

"Who  is  to  be  the  final  arbiter — the  government  or  the 
States — why,  to  yield  the  right  of  the  States  to  protect  its 
own  citizens  would  consolidate  this  government  into  a  mis- 
erable despotism." 

Goldwin  Smith  of  Cornell  University: 

"The  Southern  leaders  ought  not  to  have  been  treated  as 
rebels — secession  is  not  rebellion." 
Judge  Black,  of  Pennsylvania,  said : 

"John  Quincy  Adams,  in  1839,  and  Abraham  Lincoln, 
1847,  made  elaborate  arguments  in  favor  of  the  legal  right 
of  a  State  to  Secede." — Black's  Essays. 
American  Conflict,  Horace  Greeley,  Vol.  I,  p.  359: 

"Let  the  people  be  told  why  they  wish  to  break  up  the 
Confederation,  and  let  the  act  of  secession  be  the  echo  of  an 
unmistakable  popular  fiat.  Then  those  who  rush  to  carnage 
to  try  to  defeat  it  would  place  themselves  clearly  in  the 
wrong;. ' ' 


III. 

The  North  Was  Responsible  for  the  War  Between  the  States 

AUTHORITY: 

The  New  York  Herald,  April  7,  1861 : 

"Unless  Mr.  Lincoln's  administration  makes  the  first 
demonstration  and  attack,  President  Davis  says  there  will 
be  no  bloodshed.  "With  Mr.  Lincoln's  administration,  there- 
fore, rests  the  responsibility  of  precipitating  a  collision,  and 
the  fearful  evils  of  protracted  war." 

The  New  York  Herald,  April  5,  1861 : 

"We  have  no  doubt  Mr.  Lincoln  wants  the  Cabinet  at 
Montgomery  to  take  the  initiative  by  capturing  two  forts 
in  its  waters,  for  it  would  give  him  the  opportunity  of 
throwing  the  responsibility  of  commencing  hostilities.  But 
the  country  and  posterity  will  hold  him  just  as  responsible 
as  if  he  struck  the  first  blow. ' ' 
Sheppard's  "Life  of  Lincoln" : 

"Please  present  my  compliments  to  General  Scott  and 
tell  him  confidentially  to  be  prepared  to  hold  or  retake  the 
forts  as  the  case  may  require  after  my  inauguration." — 
Abraham  Lincoln. 
Horton's  History,  p.  71: 

' '  The  withdrawal  of  the  Southern  States  from  the  Union 
was  in  no  sense  a  declaration  of  war  upon  the  Federal  gov- 
ernment but  the  Federal  government  declared  war  on  them, 
as  history  will  show." 
Gideon  Welles: 

"There  was  not  a  man  in  the  Cabinet  that  did  not  know 
that   an  attempt  to  reinforce   Sumter  would  be  the  first 
blow  of  the  war." 
Seward  said : 

"Even  preparation  to  reinforce  will  precipitate  war." 
Stephen  Douglas  said: 

' '  Lincoln  is  trying  to  plunge  the  country  into  a  cruel  war 
as  the  surest  means  of  destroying  the  Union  upon  the  plea 
of  enforcing  the  laws  and  protecting  public  property." 
Zack  Chandler  wrote  to  Governor  Blair: 

"The  manufacturing  States  think  a  war  will  be  awful, 
but  without  a  little  blood-letting  the  Union  will  not  be  worth 
a  curse." 
William  Seward  said : 

' '  The  attempt  to  reinforce  Sumter  will  provoke  war.  The 
very  preparation  of  such  an  expedition  will  precipitate  war. 
I  would  instruct  Anderson  to  return  from  Sumter." 


IV. 
The  War  Between  the  States  Was  Not  Fought  to  Hold  the 

Slaves 

AUTHORITY: 

A  Resolution  was  passed  unanimously  by  Congress  July  23, 
1861: 

"The  war  is  waged  by  the  Government  of  the  United 
States,  not  in  the  spirit  of  conquest  or  subjugation,  nor  for 
the  purpose  of  overthrowing  or  interfering  with  the  rights 
or  institutions  of  the  states,  but  to  defend  and  protect  the 
Union." 

Abraham  Lincoln,  in  his  Inaugural  Address : 

'  *  I  have  no  purpose  directly  or  indirectly  to  interfere  with 
the  institution  of  slavery  in  the  States  where  it  exists.  I 
believe  I  have  no  lawful  right  to  do  so,  and  I  have  no  in- 
clination to  do  so." 

George  Lunt's  "Origin  of  the  Late  War,"  p.  432: 

"A  war  simply  for  the  abolition  of  slavery  would  not 
have  enlisted  a  dozen  regiments  at  the  North." 

Unanswerable  arguments  will  be  found  in  the  facts  that  a 
slaveholder,  General  U.  S.  Grant,  was  placed  in  command  of  the 
Union  Army,  and  General  Robert  E.  Lee  who  had  freed  his 
slaves  put  in  command  of  the  Confederate  forces.  Two  hun- 
dred thousand  slaveholders  only  were  in  the  Southern  Army 
while  three  hundred  and  fifteten  thousand  slaveholders  were  in 
the  Northern  Army. 

General  Grant  (Democratic  Speaker's  Handbook,  p.  33),  said: 
"Should  I  become  convinced  that  the  object  of  the  Gov- 
ernment is  to   execute   the   wishes  of   the   abolitionists,   I 
pledge  you  my  honor  as  a  man  and  a  soldier  I  would  re- 
sign my  commission  and  carry  my  sword  to  the  other  side. ' ' 

Simon  Cameron,  Lincoln's  Secretary  of  War,  wrote  to  General 
Butler  in  New  Orleans: 

"President  Lincoln  desires  the  right  to  hold  slaves  to  be 
fully  recognized.  The  war  is  prosecuted  for  the  Union 
hence  no  question  concerning  slavery  will  arise. ' ' 


Y. 
Slaves  Were  Not  Ill-Treated  in  the  South.     The  North  Was 

Largely  Responsible  for  Their  Presence  in  the  South. 

AUTHORITY: 

The  servants  were  very  happy  in  their  life  upon  the  old  planta- 
tions. William  Makepeace  Thackeray,  on  a  lecture  tour  in 
America,  visited  a  Southern  plantation.  In  ''Roundabout 
Papers"  he  gives  this  impression  of  the  slaves: 

"How  they  sang !    How  they  danced !"  How  they  laughed ! 
How  they  shouted !    How  they  bowed  and  scraped  and  com- 
plimented !    So  free,  so  happy !    I  saw  them  dressed  on  Sun- 
day  in   their   Sunday   best — far   better    dressed    than   our 
English  tenants  of  the  working  class  are  in  their  holiday 
attire.    To  me,  it  is  the  dearest  institution  I  have  ever  seen 
and  these  slaves  seem  far  better  off  than  any  tenants  I  have 
seen  under  any  other  tenantry  system.' ' 
Major  General  Quitman  of  the  United  States  Army  thus  de- 
scribed life  on  the  "Old  Plantation"  in  1822  while  stationed  in 
Mississippi : 

The  mansions  of  the  planters  are  thrown  open  to  all 
comers  and  goers  free  of  charge.  The  owner  of  this  planta- 
tion is  the  widow  of  a  Virginia  gentleman  of  distinction, 
who  was  an  officer  in  the  last  war  with  Great  Britain. 

"Her  slaves  are  a  happy,  careless,  unreflecting,  good  na- 
tured  race.  They  are  strongly  attached  to  '  old  massa, '  and 
'  old  missus ' ;  but  their  devotion  to  '  young  massa '  and  '  young 
missus '  amounts  to  enthusiasm.  While  in  a  way  these  slaves 
appear  to  be  free,  they  are  very  obedient  and  polite  and 
they  do  their  work  well. 

"These  'niggers,'  as  you  call  them,  are  the  happiest  peo- 
ple I  have  ever  seen.  They  are  oily,  sleek,  bountifully  fed, 
well  clothed  and  well  taken  care  of.     One  hears  them  at  all 

times  whistling  and  singing  cheerily  at  their  work 

"But  a  negro  will  sleep — sleep  at  his  work,  sleep  on  his 
carriage  box,  sleep  standing  up,  sleep  bare-headed  in  the 
sun,  and  sleep  sitting  on  a  high  rail  fence.  Yet,  compared 
with  the  ague-smitten  and  suffering  settlers  in  Ohio,  or  the 
sickly,  half-starved  operatives  in  the  factories  and  mines  of 
the  North  and  the  Northeast,  these  Southern  slaves  are  in- 
deed to  be  envied.  They  are  treated  with  such  great  hu- 
manity and  kindness. ' ' 
Chas.  E.  Stowe,  the  son  of  Harriet  Beecher  Stowe,  in  speaking 
at  a  negro  college,  said : 

' '  If  you  ask  me  if  the  slaves  were  better  off  under  the  in- 
stitution of  slavery  than  they  are  under  freedom,  I  must  in 
candor  answer  that  some  were — they  were  not  fit  for  free- 
dom." 

10 


Coercion  Was  Not  Constitutional 

AUTHORITY: 

William  Seward  to  London  Times  Correspondent,  Mr.  Russell, 

April  4,  1861 : 

' '  It  would  be  contrary  to  the  spirit  of  the  American  Gov- 
ernment to  use  force  to  subjugate  the  South." 

Mr.  Seward  to  Charles  Francis  Adams,  Sr.,  Minister  to  Eng- 
land, April  10,  1861 : 

"Only  a  despotic  and  imperial  government  car  3oerce 
seceding  States." 

Edward  Everett: 

"To  try  to  hold  fifteen  States  to  the  Union  is  preposter- 
ous. ' ' 

President  James  Buchanan  to  Edwin  M.  Stanton,  Secretary 

of  War : 

"There  is  no  power  under  the  Constitution  to  coerce  a 
seceding  State." 

The  New  York  Herald  : 

1 '  The  day  before  Fort  Sumter  was  surrendered  two-thirds 
of  the  newspapers  in  the  North  opposed  coercion  in  any 
shape  or  form,  and  sympathized  with  the  South.  Three- 
fifths  of  the  entire  American  people  sympathized  with  the 
South.  Over  200,000  voters  opposed  coercion  and  believed 
the  South  had  a  right  to  secede. ' ' 

11  The  Journal  of  Commerce  fought  coercion  until  the 
United  States  mail  refused  to  carry  its  papers  in  1861." 

Charles  Sumner  said : 

"Nothing  can  possibly  be  so  horrible,  so  wicked  or  so 
foolish  as  a  war  against  the  South. ' ' 

James  S.  Thayer,  of  New  York,  on  January  21,  1861,  said : 

"If  the  incoming  Administration  shall  attempt  to  carry 
out  a  line  of  policy  which  has  been  foreshadowed,  and  con- 
struct a  scaffold  for  coercion — another  name  for  execution 
— we  will  reverse  the  order  of  the  French  Revolution  and 
save  the  blood  of  the  people  by  making  those  who  would  in- 
augurate a  ' Reign  of  Terror'  the  first  victim  of  a  national 
guillotine."     (Enthusiastic  applause). 


11 


VII. 
The  Federal  Government  Was  Responsible  for  the  Anderson- 

ville  Horrors 

AUTHORITY: 

Charles  A.  Dana,  Assistant  Secretary  of  War,  said: 

"We  think  after  the  testimony  given  that  the  Confederate 
authorities  and  especially  Mr.  Davis  ought  not  to  be  held 
responsible  for  the  terrible  privations,  suffering,  and  in- 
juries which  our  men  had  to  endure  while  kept  in  Confed- 
erate Military  Prisons,  the  fact  is  unquestionable  that  while 
Confederates  desired  to  exchange  prisoners,  to  send  our 
men  home,  and  to  get  back  their  own  men,  General  Grant 
steadily  and  strenuously  resisted  such  an  exchange. ' ' — New 
York  Sun. 

General  Butler  said : 

"The  reason  for  this  was  that  the  exchange  of  prisoners 
would  strengthen  Lee 's  army  and  greatly  prolong  the  war. ' ' 

General  Grant  said: 

"Not  to  take  any  steps  by  which  an  able-bodied  man 
should  be  exchanged  until  orders  were  received  from  him.,, 

Secretary  of  War  Edwin  M.  Stanton's  statistics  testify  that 
while  there  were  fifty  thousand  more  of  prisoners  in  Southern 
prisons  than  in  Northern,  the  mortality  among  Southern  men  in 
Northern  prisons  was  far  greater. 

General  Grant,  again,  said : 

If  we  hold  these  men  caught  they  are  no  more  than  dead 
men.  If  we  liberate  them  we  will  have  to  fight  on  until  the 
whole  South  is  exterminated." 

This  agrees  with  General  Lee's  testimony  (Official  Records  War 
of  the  Rebellion)  : 

"I  offered  General  Grant  to  send  into  his  lines  all  of  the 
prisoners  within  my  Department  provided  he  would  return 
man  for  man.  When  I  notified  the  Confederate  authorities 
of  my  proposition,  I  was  told  if  accepted  they  would  gladly 
place  at  my  disposal  every  man  in  our  Southern  prisons.  I 
also  made  this  offer  to  the  Committee  of  the  United  States 
Sanitary  Commission — but  my  propositions  were  not  ac- 
cepted." 


12 


VIII. 

The  Republican  Party  That  Elected  Abraham  Lincoln  Was 

Not  Friendly  to  the  South 

AUTHORITY: 

Wendell  Phillips: 

"The  Eepublican  party  is  in  no  sense  a  National  party; 
it  is  a  party  pledged  to  work  for  the  downfall  of  Democracy, 
the  downfall  of  the  Union,  and  the  destruction  of  the  United 
States  Constitution.  The  religious  creed  of  the  party  was 
hate  of  Democracy,  hate  of  the  Union,  hate  of  the  Consti- 
tution, and  hate  of  the  Southern  people." 

Again,  he  says : 

"The  Republican  party  is  the  first  sectional  party  ever 
organized  in  this  country.  It  does  not  know  its  own  face 
and  calls  itself  National,  but  it  is  not  National,  it  is  sec- 
tional. It  is  the  party  of  the  North  pledged  against  the 
South.     It  was  organized  with  hatred  of  the  Constitution. 

"The  Republican  party  that  elected  Abraham  Lincoln  is 
pledged  to  the  downfall  of  the  Union  and  the  destruction 
of  the  United  States  Constitution. 

"William  Lloyd  Garrison  believed  in  the  Constitutional 
right  to  hold  slaves,  and  said  the  Union  must  be  dissolved 
to  free  them. 

"He  believed  in  the  Constitutional  right  of  secession,  so 
was  willing  to  publicly  burn  the  Constitution  to  destroy 
that  right  and  called  it  'a  compact  with  death  and  a  league 
with  hell.'" 

Charles  Beecher  Stowe  said: 

"The  party  that  elected  Abraham  Lincoln  was  a  party 
avowedly  hostile  to  the  institution  of  slavery." 
Had  they  not  heard  him  say  in  his  address  at  Cooper  Insti- 
tute that: 

"The  anti-slavery  sentiment  had  already  caused  more 
than  a  million  votes  which  could  only  be  seen  by  Southern 
States  to  mean  a  danger  and  menace.  Consequently  when 
they  drew  the  sword  to  defend  the  doctrine  of  States  rights 
and  the  institution  of  slavery,  they  certainly  had  on  their 
side  the  Constitution  and  the  laws  of  the  land,  for  the  Na- 
tional Constitution  justified  the  doctrine  of  State  rights." 

Mr.  Raymond,  in  the  New  York  Times,  says: 

"His  election  was  more  by  shouts  and  applause  which 
dominated  the  convention  than  from  any  direct  labors  of 
any  of  the  delegates." — Boston  Courier,  May  26,  1860. 

13 


IX. 

The  South  Desired  Peace  and  Made  Every  Effort  to  Obtain  It 

AUTHORITY: 

The  Mississippi  Convention  sent  a  commissioner  to  Maryland 
and  when  asked  what  was  the  intention  of  the  Southern  States 
by  secession,  (Shaffner's  "Secession  War,"  London,  1862), 
he  replied: 

"Secession  is  not  intended  to  break  up  the  present  gov- 
ernment, but  to  perpetuate  it.  Our  plan  is  to  withdraw  from 
the  Union  in  order  to  allow  amendments  to  the  Constitu- 
tion to  be  made,  guaranteeing  our  just  rights.  If  the  North- 
ern States  will  not  make  these  amendments — then  we  must 
secure  them  ourselves  by  a  government  of  our  own. ' ' 

Lord  Charnwood's  "Life  of  Lincoln": 

"This  madness  appeared  when  the  Congress  met  in  De- 
cember, 1860.  In  order  to  allay  the  apprehensions  of  the 
Southern  people  regarding  the  purposes  of  the  party  just 
ready  to  come  into  power,  the  Southern  members  offered 
resolution  after  resolution  looking  to  tranquility.  These 
resolutions  were  all  rejected  by  the  House  of  Representa- 
tives. 

"Then  was  offered  in  the  Senate  the  celebrated  'Critten- 
den Compromise,'  yielding  all  that  the  North  demanded  in 
regard  to  exclusion  of  slavery  from  the  Territories,  but  in- 
sisting that  the  Constitution  be  respected  as  to  fugitive 
slaves,  and  that  the  Constitution  be  maintained  and  its  pro- 
vision be  kept  as  adjudicated  by  the  Supreme  Court  of  the 
land.  The  South  made  no  new  request ;  it  went  not  outside 
of  the  Constitution.  It  rested  its  case  on  the  Constitution 
and  on  its  interpretation  by  the  highest  court  of  the  land. 
It  was  strictly  loyal  to  the  Constitution. 

Why  was  the  Crittenden  Compromise  rejected?  Be- 
cause Mr.  Lincoln  willed  it.  He  wrote  letters  to  his  party 
leaders  to  defeat  it.  He  said  'he  had  no  compromises  to 
make  with  the  South. '  The  idea  was  that  he  had  triumphed 
and  that  triumph  meant  no  surrender  in  any  respect  of  the 
new  policies. 

"It  was  a  tragic  day  when  the  Crittenden  Compromise 

was  defeated.    Not  a  single  Republican  voted  for  it. 

The  Crittenden  Resolutions  were  a  most  generous  proposition 

from  the  South  to  allow  out  of  the  1,200,000  square  miles  of 

territory  acquired  by  conquest  and  purchase,   900,000  square 

miles  for  free  territory  and  the  remaining  300,000  square  miles 

14 


to  be  free  or  slave  as  each  new  State  formed  might  choose,  and 
this,  too,  when  Southern  prowess  had  largely  gained  the  terri- 
tory. These  resolutions  in  the  interest  of  peace  were  offered  by 
Northern  and  Southern  Democrats.  Lincoln  notified  all  Re- 
publican States  through  Senators  Harlan  and  Zach  Chandler 
to  vote  against  these  resolutions.  Had  he  not  done  this  they 
would  have  passed.  Unjust  as  they  were  to  the  South,  the 
South  would  have  accepted  them,  and  Thurlow  Weed  and  Seward 
would  have  seen  that  they  were  passed  by  the  North.  It  was 
Lincoln's  fault  they  were  rejected.  George  Lunt  said  Lincoln 
later  acknowledged  that  he  regretted  this. 

Again  Lord  Charnwood  said: 

"Senator  Chandler,  of  Michigan,  had  telegraphed  to  the 
Governor  of  Michigan  to  send  delegates  to  the  Peace  Con- 
gress, 'but  to  send  stiff-necked  men  or  none — for  without  a 
little  blood  letting  the  Union  will  not  be  worth  saving.'  " 

George  Lunt,  p.  423,  says : 

"The  propositions  of  the  Peace  Conference  evidently 
formed  a  sound  basis  for  settlement  of  the  controversy. 
These  resolutions  were  introduced  by  Mr.  Crittenden,  of 
Kentucky,  and  had  they  been  adopted,  they  would  have 
saved  the  country  from  its  coming  trials.  On  the  commit- 
tee of  thirteen  reporting  these  resolutions  were  Jefferson 
Davis,  of  Mississippi ;  Mr.  Hunter,  of  Virginia ;  Robert 
Toombs,  of  Georgia ;  five  from  slave  States — eight  from 
free  States.  General  Toombs  reported  to  his  constituents 
in  Georgia  that  the  Black  Republican  solidly  voted  against 
the  resolutions.  Mr.  Douglas,  in  the  Senate,  said:  'Every 
member  from  the  South  including  Messrs.  Davis  and 
Toombs,  from  the  Cotton  States,  expressed  a  willingness  to 
accept  the  resolutions  as  a  final  settlement  of  the  contro- 
versy. Hence  the  responsibility  of  our  disagreement,  and 
the  only  difficulty  in  the  way  of  an  amicable  adjustment  is 
with  the  Republican  party."  (See  Congressional  Globe, 
Appendix  1800-61,  p.  41). 

"Mr.  Toombs,  in  the  Senate,  said  there  were  some  condi- 
tions he  would  prefer,  but  for  the  sake  of  peace — perma- 
nent peace — he  would  accept  them." 

Mr.  Pugh,  of  Ohio,  said  he  had  heard  the  senator  from 
Mississippi  (afterwards  President  Davis)  before  leaving 
the  Senate  Chamber  say  he  would  accept  it  to  maintain 
the  Union.  There  is  no  doubt  but  that  a  two-thirds  vote 
would  have  saved  the  Union." 


15 


When  it  came  to  a  final  vote  every  Republican  voted  against 
them  except  Mr.  Seivard  who  refused  to  vote  at  all.  The  resolu- 
tions were  lost  by  a  vote  of  20  to  19.  How  could  peace  have 
been  brought  about? 

Mr.  Dixon,  of  Connecticut,  in  I860,  had  the  true  idea.    He  said : 

"The  true  way  to  restore  harmony  is  by  cheerfully  and 

honestly   assuring  every   section   its   Constitutional   rights. 

No  section  professes  to  ask  more;  no  section  ought  to  offer 

less." 

Mr.  Brown,  a  personal  friend  and  colleague  of  Jefferson  Davis, 
of  Mississippi,  replied: 

"If  that  same  spirit  could  prevail  which  actuates  the 
senator  from  Connecticut,  who  has  just  taken  his  seat,  a 
different  state  of  things  might  be  produced  in  twenty  days. ' ' 

The  Rejection  of  the  Crittenden  Resolutions  created  a  crisis: 

"The  Southern  leaders  then  called  a  conference.  What 
was  to  be  done?  All  their  proposals  of  compromise,  look- 
ing to  peace,  tranquility,  security  within  the  Union,  had 
failed.  They  asked  each  other:  'What  is  the  purpose  of 
this  anti-South  party?  What  means  the  rejection  of  our 
compromises?  Why  did  Mr.  Lincoln  discountenance  any 
compromise?  What  means  this  secession  from  the  Consti- 
tution ?  This  refusal  to  abide  by  the  decisions  of  the  United 
States  Supreme  Court?  What  means  Mr.  Lincoln's  atti- 
tude in  opposing  the  Crittenden  Compromise  V 

"Despairing  of  their  rights  within  the  Union,  the  South- 
ern leaders  advised  the  Southern  States  to  throw  themselves 
back  on  their  reserved  rights  and  withdraw  from  the  Union. 
But  it  was  too  late.  It  could  have  been  done  in  1S50,  but 
not  in  1861.  From  1850  to  1860  the  North  had  educated 
the  people  of  the  North  out  of  the  Jefferson  theory  of  State 
rights." — George  Lunt. 

Second  Peace  Congress,  Ex-President  John  Tyler,  President, 
Washington,  D.  C. : 

"Virginia  did  not  act  at  the  time  with  the  Southern 
States  that  organized  the  Confederacy,  but  called  a  'Peace 
Conference.'  Twenty-one  States  responded  to  the  call. 
The  venerable  John  Tyler,  ex-President  of  the  United 
States,  was  chosen  president.  They  met  in  Washington 
on  February  4,  1861.  But  Salmon  P.  Chase,  to  be  the  Sec- 
retary of  the  Treasury  under  the  new  administration,  was 
there  as  the  representative  of  Mr.  Lincoln  and  the  new  vic- 
torious party.  His  speech  destroyed  all  hope  of  any  recon- 
ciliation.    He  refused  all  compromises,  and  said  Northern 

16 


States  would  never  fulfill  that  part  of  the  Constitution  in 
regard  to  fugitive  slaves,  and  that  the  decision  of  the  Su- 
preme Court  would  not  be  abided.  The  failure  of  this  con- 
ference was  a  great  disappointment,  especially  to  Virginia. 
Mr.  Lincoln  took  the  same  stand  as  he  did  regarding  the 
Crittenden  Compromise." — Lord  Charn wood's  "Life  of 
Lincoln." 

Judge  Salmon  P.  Chase  in  Peace  Congress : 

' '  I  must  tell  you  further  that  under  no  inducements  what- 
ever will  we  consent  to  surrender  a  principle  which  we  be- 
lieve to  be  sound,  and  so  important  as  that  of  restricting 
slavery  within  State  limits." 

And  again  he  said : 

"The  people  of  the  free  States  who  believe  that  slavery 
is  wrong  cannot  and  will  not  aid  in  returning  runaway 
slaves  and  the  law  becomes  a  dead  letter. ' ' 

Now,   this  was  in  defiance  of  the  decision  of  the   Supreme 
Court  in  the  Dred  Scott  case. 
Secretary  Chase  announced  that: 

"The  Republican  party  would  concede  nothing  in  regard 
to  slave  extension  in  the  Territories,  and  the  Northern 
States  would  never  fulfill  their  Constitutional  obligations." 
(There  was  nothing  to  do  but  to  adjourn). 

The  third  attempt  was  when  the  Peace  Commissioners  were  sent 
from  the  Confederate  government  with  this  message : 

"The  undersigned  are  instructed  to  make  to  the  Govern- 
ment of  the  Hinted  States  overtures  for  the  opening  of  ne- 
gotiations, assuring  the  Government  of  the  United  States 
that  the  President,  Congress,  and  people  of  the  Confeder- 
ate States  earnestly  desire  a  peaceful  solution  of  these  great 
questions;  that  it  is  neither  their  interest  nor  their  wish  to 
make  any  demand  which  is  not  founded  in  strictest  justice, 
nor  do  any  act  to  injure  their  late  Confederates." 

Vessels  were  manned  and  armed  while  the  delegates  were 
waiting  in  Washington;  and  were  sent  to  provision  and  rein- 
force Sumter.  The  last  effort  at  peace  was  the  HAMPTON 
ROADS  CONFERENCE.  It  failed.  (See  Gen.  Julian  Oarr's 
pamphlet). 


17 


X. 

The  Policy  of  the  Northern  Army  Was  to  Destroy  Property — 
That  of  the  Southern  Army  to  Protect  It 

AUTHORITY: 

Sheridan's  Official  Report: 

"I  have  burned  two  thousand  barns  filled  with  wheat 
and  corn,  all  the  mills  in  the  whole  country,  destroyed  all 
the  factories  of  cloth,  killed  or  driven  off  every  animal, 
even  the  poultry  that  could  contribute  to  human  sustenance. 

"Nothing  should  be  left  in  the  Shenandoah  but  eyes  to 
lament  the  war." 

Sherman's  Memoirs: 

' '  It  will  not  be  necessary  to  sow  salt  on  the  site  of  Charles- 
ton after  the  Fifteenth  Corps  has  done  its  work." 

"One  hundred  million  dollars  of  damage  has  been  done 
to  Georgia ;  $20,000,000  inured  to  our  benefit,  the  remainder 
simply  waste  and  destruction." 

"On  General  Howell  Cobb's  plantation  I  told  my  men  to 
spare  nothing." 

"I'll  not  restrain  the  army  lest  its  vigor  and  energy  be 
impaired."  (p.  185). 

"In  South  Carolina  I  kindled  my  fire  with  an  old  mantel 
clock,  and  a  piece  of  a  handsome  old  bedstead."     (p.  225). 

"Orders  to  kill  Jeff  Davis  and  his  Cabinet  on  the  spot" 
were  found  on  the  person  of  Dahlgren  in  Richmond,  Va. 

Lord  Palmerson  in  the  British  House  of  Commons  took  oc- 
casion to  express  deepest  indignation  at  General  Butler's  in- 
famous order  No.  28  against  the  ladies  of  New  Orleans. 
General   Grant   to   Hunter  in   the   Shenandoah  Valley,   Vir- 
ginia : 

"Nothing  shall  be  left  to  invite  the  enemy  to  return." 

'  "City  Point,  July  14,  1864. 
"  'Major-General  Halleck,  "Washington,  D.  C. 

"  'If  the  enemy  has  left  Maryland,  as  I  suppose  he  has, 
he  should  have  upon  his  heels  veterans,  militiamen,  men  on 
horseback,  and  everything  that  can  be  got  to  follow  to  eat 
out  Virginia  clear  and  clean  as  they  go,  so  that  the  crows 
flying  over  it  will  have  to  carry  their  provender  with  them. 
"(Signed)  U.  S.  GRANT, 

"  'Lieutenant-General.'  " 


"  'City  Point,  August  26,  1864. 
"  'Major-General  Sheridan,  Halltown,  Va. : 

"  'Do  all  the  damage  to  railroads  and  crops  you  can. 
Carry  off  stock  of  all  descriptions  and  negroes,  so  as  to  pre- 
vent further  planting.  We  want  the  Shenandoah  Valley 
to  remain  a  barren  waste. 

"  '(Signed)  U.  S.  GRANT, 

"  'Lieutenant-General.'  " 

"  'Headquarters  Middle  Military  Division, 

"  'Harrisburg,  Sept.  28,  1864,  10:30  p.  m. 
"  'Brig.-Gen.  W.  Merritt,  Commanding  First  Cavalry  Di- 
vision : 
"  'General:  The  general  commanding  directed  that  you 
leave  a  small  force  to  watch  Swift  Run  and  Brown  Gap  and 
with  balance  of  your  command  and  Custer's  Division  to 
swing  around  through  or  near  Piedmont,  extending  toward 
and  as  near  Staunton  as  possible.  Destroy  all  mills,  all 
grain,  and  all  forage  you  can  and  drive  off  or  kill  all  stock 
and  otherwise  carry  out  instructions  of  Lieutenant-General 
Grant,  an  extract  of  which  is  sent  you  and  which  means 
'leave  a  barren  waste.' 

"  '  (Signed)  JAMES  W.  FORSYTH, 

"  'Lieut.-Col.  and  Chief  of  Staff  to  General  Sheridan.'  " 

"  'Headquarters  of  the  Army,  Washington,  D.  C, 

"  'December  18,  1864. 
"  'Major-General  Sherman,  Savannah: 

"  'Should  you  capture  Charleston,  I  hope  that  by  some 
accident  the  place  may  be  destroyed;  and  if  a  little  salt 
should  be  sown  upon  the  site,  it  may  prevent  the  growth  of 
future  crops  of  nullification  and  secession. 

"  '(Signed)  W.  H.  HALLE CK, 

"  'Chief  of  Staff'  " 

"  'Field  Headquarters  of  the  Military  Division  of 

the  Mississippi,  Savannah,  December  24,  1864. 
"  'Major-General  W.   H.   Halleck,   Chief   of   Staff,   Wash- 
ington, D.   C. : 
"  'I  will  bear  in  mind  your  hint  as  to  Charleston,  and  I 
do  not  think  'salt'  will  be  necessary.     When  I  move,  the 
Fifteenth  Corps  will  be  on  the  right  of  the  right  wing,  and 
their  postiion  will  bring  them  into  Charleston  first ;  and  if 
you  have  watched  the  history  of  this  corps,  you  will  have 
remarked  that  it  generally  does  its  work  pretty  well. 
^  "  'The  truth  is,  the  whole  army  is  burning  with  an  insa- 
tiable desire  to  wreak  vengeance  upon  South  Carolina.     I 
almost  tremble  at  her  fate,  but  feel  that  she  deserves  all 

19 


that  seems  in  store  for  Tier.  We  must  make  old  and  young, 
rich  and  poor,  feel  the  hard  hand  of  war  as  well  as  their 
organized  armies. 

"  '  (Signed)  W.  T.  SHERMAN, 

"  'Major-General.'  " 

Major  Nichols,  "The  Story  of  a  Great  March,  November  15, 
1864  (p.  38),  Atlanta,  Ga. : 

"A  grand  and  awful  spectacle  is  presented  to  the  be- 
holders of  this  beautiful  city  now  in  flames.  The  Heaven 
is  one  expanse  of  lurid  fire.  The  air  is  filled  with  flying, 
burning  cinders.  Buildings  covering  200  acres  are  in  ruins 
or  flames." 

"We  are  leaving  Atlanta.  Behind  we  leave  a  track  of 
smoke  and  flame.  Yesterday  we  saw  in  the  distance  a  pillar 
of  smoke ;  the  bridges  were  all  in  flames.  I  heard  a  soldier 
say,  'I  believe  Sherman  has  set  the  very  river  on  fire.'  His 
comrades  replied,  '  If  he  has  its  all  right. '  The  rebel  inhab- 
itants are  in  an  agony.  The  soldiers  are  as  hearty  and  jolly 
as  men  can  be."    (p.  37). 

"The  soldiers  are  hunting  for  concealed  things  and  these 
searches  are  one  of  the  pleasant  excitements  of  our  march." 
(p.  39). 

Sherman's  Memoirs,  Vol.  II,  p.  287: 

"In  my  official  report  of  the  conflagration  of  Columbia 
I  distinctly  charged  it  to  General  Wade  Hampton,  and  now 
I  confess  I  did  it  pointedly  to  shake  the  faith  of  his  people 
in  him." 

Gregg's  History,  p.  375 : 

"The  devastation  of  the  Palatine  hardly  exceeded  the 
desolation  and  misery  wrought  by  the  Republican  invasion 
and  conquest  of  the  South.  No  conquered  nation  of  modern 
days,  not  Poland  under  the  heel  of  Nicholas,  nor  Spain  or 
Russia  under  that  of  Napoleon,  suffered  from  such  individ- 
ual and  collective  ruin  or  saw  before  so  frightful  a  pros- 
pect as  the  States  dragged  by  force  in  April,  1865." 

CONTRAST : 
President  Davis: 

"In  regard  to  the  enemy's  crews  and  vessels  you  are  to 
proceed  with  the  justice  and  humanity  which  characterize 
our  government  and  its  citizens." 

"General  Lee,  for  fear  his  soldiers  should  pillage  while 
foraging  in  Pennsylvania,  had  the  roll  call  three  times 
daily." 

20 


It  is  true  General  Early  did  burn  Chambersburg,  Pa.,  but  it 
was  only  after  a  refusal  by  the  people  to  pay  the  $100,000  de- 
manded for  General  Hunter's  destruction  in  the  Shenandoah 
Valley. 

"When  at  York,  Pa.,  he  was  urged  to  burn  that  place  in  retalia- 
tion.    He  said: 

"We  do  not  make  war  on  women  and  children." 

General  John  B.  Gordon  to  the  women  in  York,  Pa. : 

"If  the  torch  is  applied  to  a  single  dwelling  or  an  insult 
offered  to  a  woman  by  a  soldier  in  my  command,  point  me 
the  man  and  you  shall  have  his  life." 

Charles  Francis  Adams  testified: 

"I  doubt  if  a  hostile  foe  ever  advanced  in  an  enemy's 
country  or  fell  back  from  it  in  retreat  leaving  behind  it 
less  cause  for  hate  and  bitterness  than  did  the  Army  of 
Northern  Virginia." 

R.  E.  Lee,  Commanding  General,  Chambersburg,  Penn.,  June 
21,  1863: 

"The  commanding  general  considers  that  no  greater  dis- 
grace could  befall  the  army,  and  through  it  our  whole  peo- 
ple, than  the  perpetuation  of  the  barbarous  outrages  upon 
the  unarmed  and  defenseless  and  the  wanton  destruction 
of  private  property  that  have  marked  the  course  of  the 
enemy  in  our  own  country. 

"Such  proceedings  not  only  degrade  the  perpetrators  and 
all  conected  with  them,  but  are  subversive  of  the  discipline 
and  efficiency  of  the  army  and  destructive  of  the  ends  of 
our  present  movement.  It  must  be  remembered  that  we 
make  war  only  upon  armed  men,  and  that  we  cannot  take 
vengeance  for  the  wrongs  our  people  have  suffered  without 
lowering  ourselves  in  the  eyes  of  all  whose  abhorrence  has 
been  excited  by  the  atrocities  of  our  enemies  and  offending 
against  Him  to  whom  vengeance  belongeth,  without  whose 
favor  and  support  our  efforts  all  prove  in  vain.  The  com- 
manding general,  therefore,  earnestly  exhorts  the  troops  to 
abstain,  with  most  scrupulous  care,  from  unnecessary  or 
wanton  injury  to  private  property,  and  he  enjoins  upon  all 
officers  to  arrest  and  bring  to  summary  punishment  all  who 
shall  in  any  way  offend  against  the  orders  on  this  subject." 


21 


XL 
The  South  Has  Never  Had  Her  Rightful  Place  In  Literature 

AUTHORITY: 

Harriet  Martineau  said : 

"For  more  than  fifty  years  after  the  Revolution  the  best 
specimen  of  periodical  literature  that  this  country  afforded 
was  'The  Southern  Review,'  published  at  Charleston,  S.  C, 
by  Bledsoe/ ' 

Hamilton  W.  Mabie  placed  Poe,  Timrod  and  Lanier  as  equal 
in  poetic  quality  with  Bryant,  Whittier  and  Longfellow.  He 
said: 

"In  the  widening  literary  activity  the  South  has  borne 
a  very  notable  part — indeed,  it  may  be  said  that  it  has 
borne  the  chief  part." 

Pancoast,  of  Philadelphia,  says: 

"The  Southern  story  writers  have  done  more  than  given 
us  studies  of  new  localities.  We  feel  instinctively  a  differ- 
ent quality  in  their  work.  Contrasted  with  the  New  Eng- 
land writers  we  feel  the  richer  coloring,  the  warmer  blood, 
and  the  quicker  pulses.  When  you  read  Hawthorne  and 
then  turn  to  'Marse  Chan'  and  'Meh  Lady'  by  Thomas  Nel- 
son Page,  it  is  like  passing  from  the  world  of  thought  to  the 
world  of  action — from  the  analysis  of  life  to  true  living. 
It  is  a  world  where  the  men  are  full  of  knightly  deeds." 

Hamilton  Mabie  said: 

1 '  The  genius  of  the  Old  South  went  into  the  management 
of  public  affairs  and  gave  the  country  a  group  of  statesmen 
that  will  not  suffer  by  comparison  with  the  foremost  public 
men  of  any  country." 

Then  again: 

"The  South  of  today  has  no  explanations  to  make;  her 
quota  of  writers  of  original  gift  and  genuine  art  is  perhaps 
more  important  than  that  furnished  by  any  other  section  of 
our  country.  These  writers  exhibit  certain  qualities  of  the 
Southern  temperament  from  which  much  may  be  expected 
in  the  literature  of  the  future.  Their  work  comes  from  the 
heart  rather  than  from  analytical  faculties.  It  is  made  of 
flesh  and  blood,  and  it  is  therefore  simple,  tender,  humor- 
ous and  altogether  human,  and  those  qualities  give  assur- 
ance that  it  has  long  life  before  it." — The  Outlook. 

What  does  John  Fiske,  a  great  historian  of  this  century  say? 

22 


While  unjust  to  the  South  in  many  things  he  realizes  the  part 
the  South  has  played  in  the  making  of  the  Nation : 

"Jefferson,  "Washington,  Madison,  Marshall  and  Alexan- 
der Hamilton  are  distinguished  above  all  others  and  in  an 
especial  sense  they  deserve  to  be  called  the  founders  of  the 
American  Union. 

"The  Declaration  of  Independence  ranks  with  the  Magna 
Charta  and  the  Bill  of  Rights  as  one  of  the  three  greatest 
"     of  State  papers. 

"John  Marshall,  Chief  Justice  for  thirty  years,  settled 
the  relations  of  the  Executive,  Legislative,  and  Judicial 
branches  of  the  government. 

"James  Madison,  as  a  constructive  thinker,  did  more  than 
all  others  not  only  to  create  the  Constitution,  but  to  secure 
its  ratification." 

What  section  of  the  country  ever  produced  greater  orators 
than  Henry  Clay,  John  C.  Calhoun,  John  Forsyth,  Benjamin 
H.  Hill,  Robert  Toombs,  Howell  Cobb,  Alexander  Stephens, 
Robert  Y.  Hayne,  William  H.  Yancey  and  a  host  of  others  ? 

The  greatest  American  dramatist  was  Augustin  Daly?  North 
Carolina. 

In  "The  Outlook"  in  1899  appeared  this  article  from  the  pen 
of  Hamilton  Mabie: 

"The  South  never  lacked  institutions  to  keep  alive  the 
best  traditions  of  scholarship — never  lacked  culture  to  keep 
in  touch  with  the  best  of  thought  and  art  in  the  Old  World 
and  the  New.  A  love  of  letters  was  really  keener  in  the 
South  than  in  New  England,  and  there  was  a  much  larger 
group  of  highly  educated  men  in  the  South  than  in  New 
England — but  ethics  and  religion  made  literature  of  sec- 
ondary importance. 

"The  genius  of  the  Old  South  went  into  the  manage- 
ment of  public  affairs,  but  it  gave  the  country  a  group  of 
statesmen  who  would  add  dignity  to  the  most  illustrious 
periods  of  statesmenship — such  men  as  Washington,  Jeffer- 
son, Madison,  and  Marshall — they  will  not  suffer  by  com- 
parison with  the  foremost  public  men  of  the  country." 


23 


rr  i    n  nr\  a     AVt/      /  n  o  ey 


OSZAR »